Keda ma võiksin D&D-s mängida

Ex tegi testi milline tüüp ta võiks D&D-s olla. Ma pole D&D kunagi mänginud (midagi sarnast kunagi ammu olen), aga tahtsin ka testi teha. Võrdluseks. Kuna paljudel küsimustel mulle sobivat vastust polnud ja mitmele vastasin “midagi muud”, siis vastus tuli nagu tuli. Näiteks küsimus: Kas sa veedaksid 2 tundi parema meelega spordisaalis või kirikus? Loomulikult ma valisin kiriku. Ma võin sporti teha küll, aga värskes õhus. Spordisaalid imevad. Samas kirikud on huvitavad, eriti veel siis kui seal mõnda spets teenistust peetakse, millega mul isiklikult pole mingit pistmist. (Olen olnud kutsutud mingisse meie tavalisse kirikusse pulma ja kuna ma pidin seal algusest lõpuni istuma, hakkas igav). Sedatüüpi küsimusi oli veel. Seepärast ma vastuseks mingi spiooni saingi. Seal küsiti ka, et kas sa tahaksid spioon olla. Ma ei taha, sest muarust on totter kedagi teist kellegi kolmanda jaoks valetamisega teenida ja üldse riigid imevad. Seal oli aga variant, et ma seepärast ei taha, et ma olen hull rahvuslane. No tere hommikust.

Aga eksiga võrreldes on temal 3 esimest näitajat kõrgemad ja mul kolm viimast. Et ma eelistaks siiski meest, kel arvab, et tal on minuga võrreldes mõistust rohkem kui füüsist, ma arvan😀

Vot ja selline tulemus siis. Mina ei kujuta ette palju seal tõtt võiks olla.

I Am A: True Neutral Human Rogue (6th Level)

Ability Scores:

Strength-12

Dexterity-14

Constitution-14

Intelligence-18

Wisdom-15

Charisma-14

Alignment:
True Neutral A true neutral character does what seems to be a good idea. He doesn’t feel strongly one way or the other when it comes to good vs. evil or law vs. chaos. Most true neutral characters exhibit a lack of conviction or bias rather than a commitment to neutrality. Such a character thinks of good as better than evil after all, he would rather have good neighbors and rulers than evil ones. Still, he’s not personally committed to upholding good in any abstract or universal way. Some true neutral characters, on the other hand, commit themselves philosophically to neutrality. They see good, evil, law, and chaos as prejudices and dangerous extremes. They advocate the middle way of neutrality as the best, most balanced road in the long run. True neutral is the best alignment you can be because it means you act naturally, without prejudice or compulsion. However, true neutral can be a dangerous alignment when it represents apathy, indifference, and a lack of conviction.

Race:
Humans are the most adaptable of the common races. Short generations and a penchant for migration and conquest have made them physically diverse as well. Humans are often unorthodox in their dress, sporting unusual hairstyles, fanciful clothes, tattoos, and the like.

Class:
Rogues have little in common with each other. While some – maybe even the majority – are stealthy thieves, many serve as scouts, spies, investigators, diplomats, and simple thugs. Rogues are versatile, adaptable, and skilled at getting what others don’t want them to get. While not equal to a fighter in combat, a rogue knows how to hit where it hurts, and a sneak attack can dish out a lot of damage. Rogues also seem to have a sixth sense when it comes to avoiding danger. Experienced rogues develop nearly magical powers and skills as they master the arts of stealth, evasion, and sneak attacks. In addition, while not capable of casting spells on their own, a rogue can sometimes ‘fake it’ well enough to cast spells from scrolls, activate wands, and use just about any other magic item.

Find out What Kind of Dungeons and Dragons Character Would You Be?,

%d bloggers like this: